Picture of Katrina Rotter
Sustainability: The way to go
by Katrina Rotter - Tuesday, 11 November 2014, 6:09 PM
 

Climate change is happening.  There have already been enough changes in the Earth’s systems that it seems highly unlikely we will be able to go back to levels of CO2, global temperatures, or sea level rise that would cause no impact to societies around the globe.  Therefore, we will need to think of ways to minimize the impacts.  Sustainability is the way to think going forward, because it suggests that we need to balance humans’ well-being and the Earth’s (since it sustains us).  We want to ensure the continued health of everyone and everything on the planet.

Sustainability suggests that we will have to make changes to our (human) practices in order to counteract the manmade aspects of climate change.  As the levels of CO2 continue to rise, the temperature on Earth will continue to rise, the oceans will continue to become more acidic and plants and animals will change or die out depending on their ability to migrate.  These climate changes that are ongoing are leading us down an unsustainable path.  So we must change. Whether those changes act to mitigate and/or to adapt to the new climate system, we cannot continue on as before. 

The sustainable practices that have been suggested range from long term to short term solutions.  Some of them are untested and the consequences of trying them are unknown (eg geoengineering).  Some suggestions would act in a longer period of time, reducing emissions of CO2 to varying degrees in order to attempt to stabilize the change at an acceptable level.  This might, in turn, affect the climate on earth as the upward trend in CO2 is leveled off or even decreased.  This will change what is needed to sustain life on Earth.

Picture of Emily Maddox
Re: Sustainability: The way to go
by Emily Maddox - Thursday, 13 November 2014, 6:46 PM
 

I completely agree -- sustainability is the way to go! The fact that the consequences of such technologies like geoengineering are unknown is too frightening in my opinion. Can we really in good conscience implement a technology that could potentially have global scale repercussions that are unknown to us? How many thousands if not millions of peoples could we affect? Thankfully we do know sustainable choices that we can choose to do can make a difference! I refuse single-use plastic!

Picture of Judy Gerber
Re: Sustainability: The way to go
by Judy Gerber - Monday, 17 November 2014, 9:57 PM
 

I agree about sustainability, too. I also agree that everything I've read about geoengineering makes me think it's madness. Years ago I took a course at SF State about violent weather--taught by PG&E's chief meteorologist. He said they have been seeding the clouds over the Sierras for years to produce more rain and that there are no consequences to that. He was quite cavalier about it and while I didn't know enough to refute what he said, I thought that his attitude was disturbing. And that's what I worry is the attitude of geoengineers trying to tackle climate change--what about all of those unforeseen consequences?

Picture of Mike Lynch
Re: Sustainability: The way to go
by Mike Lynch - Tuesday, 18 November 2014, 12:16 AM
 

While I agree that a majority of the geoengineering practices described in the articles we read sound like sci-fi, I am a HUGE fan of afforestation.  In fact, in the IPCC video they used a reforestation effort in South America(?) as an example of an adaptation to climate change.  Considering the harm we have done to carbon sinks like the world's forests in the past, replanting trees seems like the least we can do!

Picture of Judy Gerber
Re: Sustainability: The way to go
by Judy Gerber - Monday, 17 November 2014, 11:13 PM
 

I agree about sustainability, too. I also agree that everything I've read about geoengineering makes me think it's madness. Years ago I took a course at SF State about violent weather--taught by PG&E's chief meteorologist. He said they have been seeding the clouds over the Sierras for years to produce more rain and that there are no consequences to that. He was quite cavalier about it and while I didn't know enough to refute what he said, I thought that his attitude was disturbing. And that's what I worry is the attitude of geoengineers trying to tackle climate change--what about all of those unforeseen consequences?

Picture of Judy Gerber
Re: Sustainability: The way to go
by Judy Gerber - Monday, 17 November 2014, 11:13 PM
 

I agree about sustainability, too. I also agree that everything I've read about geoengineering makes me think it's madness. Years ago I took a course at SF State about violent weather--taught by PG&E's chief meteorologist. He said they have been seeding the clouds over the Sierras for years to produce more rain and that there are no consequences to that. He was quite cavalier about it and while I didn't know enough to refute what he said, I thought that his attitude was disturbing. And that's what I worry is the attitude of geoengineers trying to tackle climate change--what about all of those unforeseen consequences?

Picture of Judy Gerber
Re: Sustainability: The way to go
by Judy Gerber - Monday, 17 November 2014, 11:13 PM
 

I agree about sustainability, too. I also agree that everything I've read about geoengineering makes me think it's madness. Years ago I took a course at SF State about violent weather--taught by PG&E's chief meteorologist. He said they have been seeding the clouds over the Sierras for years to produce more rain and that there are no consequences to that. He was quite cavalier about it and while I didn't know enough to refute what he said, I thought that his attitude was disturbing. And that's what I worry is the attitude of geoengineers trying to tackle climate change--what about all of those unforeseen consequences?